Writing and/as Code 2.0 (posted 27 October 2004)
Readings:
The Bug (87-153);
Steve Ramsay and Geoffrey Rockwell, “Writing as Programming as Writing”:
http://www.otal.umd.edu/~mgk/wap.pdf (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
She gives you an autograph and you walk away with a smile on you face.
If you want this to be your happy ending, then don't go to Nov. 1st.
If you don't want this to be a happy ending, then do go to Nov. 1st.
If the above message confuses you, go to Sept. 22nd.
Posted by: Trish Willard on September 22, 2004 08:28 PM | Permalink to CommentI really like this passage because it compares programmers with ancient Greek philosophers.
Posted by: jonida gjika on October 27, 2004 02:00 PM | Permalink to CommentI found something sortof relevant: SoLaSI.org has a page called Writing for Programmers, that tries to explain essay writing in C++ terms. It's interesting, albeit a bit incomplete:
http://www.solasi.org/moin.cgi/WritingForProgrammers
Posted by: Matt Bowen on October 27, 2004 02:42 PM | Permalink to Commentdammit, now there is no context at all for that post.
Posted by: trish willard on October 28, 2004 08:34 PM | Permalink to CommentSorry. It's called "comment spam" and it's the bane of the blogosphere. I have a 'bot scrubbing this blog clean as we speak.
Posted by: MGK on October 28, 2004 08:37 PM | Permalink to Commentmaybe we should have a class discussion on how cybertexts on the net are inevitably exploited by people trying to make a quick buck.
Posted by: Mike McGrath on October 29, 2004 04:55 PM | Permalink to Commentmaybe we should have a class discussion on how cybertexts on the net are inevitably exploited by people trying to make a quick buck.
Posted by: Mike McGrath on October 29, 2004 04:56 PM | Permalink to CommentCool idea, Mike.
Also, I really wish we'd talked about the Ramsay/Rockwell reading, as it was really interesting.
Posted by: Sandi on October 30, 2004 06:31 PM | Permalink to CommentNo fear, I want to talk about it too and we will on Monday. Between going over the exam and getting into the MOO there just wasn't time on Wed.
Posted by: MGK on October 30, 2004 06:36 PM | Permalink to CommentIn the discussion of whether code is a form of text, I thought it was interesting to consider the computer as an audience/ reader. It's neat that technology has come so far that a nonhuman can be considered an audience.
Posted by: Kathleen Moeller on October 31, 2004 02:47 PM | Permalink to CommentI like how rockwell compares a machine to the mind, which I believe is true because the mind functions in many different ways.
Posted by: rhadia on November 1, 2004 07:50 AM | Permalink to CommentMGK- Just curious as to how you can have a "bot" clean up the spam on this site? How does it distinguish between spam and , er, non-spam material?
Posted by: Adam Zimbalist on November 6, 2004 08:18 PM | Permalink to CommentAdam,
It's really just a blacklist that blocks known spam URLs and keywords. You can't post a comment using the over-the-counter name of a certain little blue pill, for example.
Posted by: MGK on November 7, 2004 12:03 AM | Permalink to Comment