Writing and/as Code 1.0 (posted 25 October 2004)
Reading: The Bug (1-87).
WARNING: SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS (don't read if you haven't finished the book yet).
I found a pretty neat version of the game of life in 3D:
http://www.people.nnov.ru/fractal/Life/Game.htm
It's sorta mindbending, but worth a look.
Posted by: Matt Bowen on October 24, 2004 04:20 PM | Permalink to CommentI finished the whole book and I liked the easy to read and descriptive nature of The Bug. I know little about computer programming, but I like how some information about it was incoporated into the book. I don't think The Bug is cybertext though because it required little effort to read since narration simply alternated between Roberta and Ethan. There are no choices about what paths can be taken in The Bug. The book must be read from start to finish exactly in order for it to make sense to the reader.
Posted by: Kathleen Moeller on October 24, 2004 06:16 PM | Permalink to CommentI'm half-way through The Bug, and I'll agree that it's a pretty easy read.
I think that the descriptions of the programming process may be a tad melodramatic though: compiling and re-compiling isn't nearly the cycles of deconstruction and reconstruction that the book makes it out to be.
There is truth in the way that the book depicts a single bug expanding to become a bane of existence though; the worst thing that can happen to a programmer is when the computer, an archetype of logical processes, does not behave with that crystal clarity.
I do believe that code can be considered writings, though. For example http://ioccc.org/2001/jason.c is a text adventure in the C programming language that is crafted to not contain a single recognizable keyword.
Posted by: David on October 25, 2004 02:17 PM | Permalink to CommentFor more information about obfuscated C text adventure linked above, see http://ioccc.org/2001/jason.hint
Posted by: David on October 25, 2004 02:19 PM | Permalink to Comment