Influenced by smart people like Nick Montfort and Jason Rhody, I’ve adjusted my upper-level undergraduate “Computer and Text” to include more of an emphasis on procedural works or “cybertext.” The revised description follows. Yes, they’ll be buying Espen’s book. I still don’t love the term “cybertext,” by the way—while I respect the etymology, it sounds garish to the uninitiated and many students remain distracted by the “cyber” part no matter how carefully we talk about ergodics encompassing both printed and digital texts. I’ve also adjusted the technical component of the course (hence the final paragraph). When I first began teaching this material around 1996 or 1997, learning HTML was a useful value-added. Nowadays I find most students either know HTML, or at least know how to use a WYSIWYG. The real problem though is that the kind of HTML I can teach in a limited time frame—how to put up a basic page with some images and graphic effects—is no longer adequate in an era of CSS, JavaScript, XML, and so forth. While I’d be happy to teach that stuff too, the course would then shift into something else—more of a design or production course. So, the upshot is that our keyboard time will be used more for tactical exercises and McLuhanesque probes rather than for outright production.
ENGL 467: Computer and Text
This course will explore what one recent critic has called cybertexts: works of literature, primarily but not exclusively digital, that are meant to be played, navigated, and manipulated in addition to “read” in the conventional sense. Choose Your Own Adventure books are examples of printed cybertexts with which you might be familiar, though as we will see they only scratch the surface—quite unimaginatively—of what is possible within the form. Specific topics will include: interactive fiction; chatterbots and intelligent agents; MUDs and MOOs; writing and/as code; hypertext, both stand-alone formats and networked on the World Wide Web; literary games and simulations; and emergent literature or “smart” texts. We will read/play/explore works from all of these genres and formats, and our discussions will focus on both identifying the cybertextual traits they have in common as well as discriminating each form’s unique achievements and significance. These discussions will be set within a broader consideration of textuality, including the question of what a text actually is—an old question which digital technologies now ask us to ask anew. You will leave the course with a sense of the literary and digital tradition of cybertext, hands-on experience of some of the most innovative literature being produced today, and (hopefully) some fundamentally new ways of thinking about texts and textuality.
Requirements: class participation, weekly responses, short papers, one longer paper or digital project, mid-term and final exams.
Posted by mgk at October 6, 2003 10:19 AMA note on expectations: there are no technical pre-requisites for this course. You do not have to be—nor should you expect to become!—a computer professional. Students seeking only practical instruction in software, programming, or Web design would be best advised to look elsewhere. We will, however, be using a computer-equipped classroom for weekly exercises and experiments to build on our theoretical understandings, and try our hands at producing some cybertexts ourselves.
Looks great Matt - what other texts are you thinking about using (either primary or secondary)?
Despite its length, I think that I'd be tempted by _House of Leaves_.
Also - as a side note - if you want to dodge teaching HTML, you can always point them towards the excellent Peer Training program with OIT. If you call over, they might even set up a session just for your class (for those who need it).
Posted by: Jason at October 6, 2003 01:34 PM | Link to CommentI had a similar problem... and I've found that introducing students to weblogs helps accelerate students' confidence in cyberspace.
I used to each a 300-level course that tried to combine technical skills with theory, and as the technology advanced, the theory got more and more compressed. I had them borrow communal copies of Landow's Hypertext from the bookstore, but asked them to purchase Aarseth's Cybertext.
Now I'm teaching a 200-level course that doesn't have much room for theory. I start with familiar forms such as text-messaging and e-mail, and will end up talking about Wikis. It's really a writing course, and it's offered under a "journalism" umbrella, so I've had to look at texts through the lens of that profession. And in a course that compressed, while student did feel comfortable using WYSIWYG tools, I was worred that instead of teaching HTML authorship I was teaching them "how to use MS FrontPage" -- the wizards and non-standard gadgets distracted them from the more basic business of making web pages. So I'm using FrontPage express -- a free program, written before Microsoft started trying to take over the Internet with its non-standard web features.
I'll also be teaching a separate 300-level seminar in media aesthetics -- there will be more room for theory in that course, though the 200-level course is not a prerequisite.
For the first time, I've tried getting my e-text students to blog -- and so far it's been very successful in terms of getting students to see exactly what is different about hypertext, without distracting them with too many design issues up front. I also ran into the unexpected problem of some students taking such an ownership to their weblogs that the homework assignements seemed like an intrusion.
Posted by: Dennis G. Jerz at October 6, 2003 02:37 PM | Link to CommentA non-content-related commment: please consider turning off justification in your text; it makes for very awkward visually distracting spacing between words. :(
Posted by: Liz Lawley at October 6, 2003 03:05 PM | Link to CommentOh, but I love justification! Even when I draft my own writng I _need_ justification turned on. Those ragged right margins drive me crazy. I know, it's a weird tick and arguably counter-productive, as you suggest--and I'm really not a control freak--but don't we all have our formatting fetishes?
Posted by: MGK at October 6, 2003 03:44 PM | Link to CommentJason--I'm going to try to have them work through each of extended examples in Cybertext, including afternoon. They'll also read Ullman's The Bug, and lots of e-literature on the Web. I'll post the syllabus when it's ready this winter.
Nice. For added hacker freakiness, you could always screen Pi. ;)
Looking forward to seeing the whole syllabus...
Posted by: Jason at October 6, 2003 08:00 PM | Link to Comment