September 11, 2003

Fearful Symmetry

In the summer of 1991 I worked as a gofer in a small law office in lower Manhattan, on Chambers Street near City Hall and about six blocks from the World Trade Center. The towers were just part of my urban landscape, with a post office and a subway station I sometimes used. But I remember one bright afternoon wandering over to the central plaza and walking right up to one of the buildings. Unlike the Empire State building, which rises in step-wise fashion (for structural reasons? so that jumpers don’t land on the streets below? I don’t know) the sides of the towers were sheer: you could stand at the base, press your back up against the building (warmed by the lunch-time sun) and look straight straight up, inducing a kind of inverted vertigo. Which is what I did.

Ten years later, about six weeks after 9/11, I had to be in lower Manhattan for a meeting at the MLA offices, not far from the law office where I worked that summer. Naturally I walked over to “ground zero” at the end of the day. I circumnavigated the site, trying to see what I could see. At one point, along one of the side streets off of Broadway, I found a gate where a convoy of trucks was assembling to exit with their loads of debris. The trucks were big flatbeds, and each one bore one of the towers’ enormous steel girders, bent and twisted and caked with muck, like something that had lain under the sea for hundreds of years before being hoisted, wet and briney, to the bright surface.

In my mind I want to reconcile these two images, find a way to superimpose them in their fearful symmetry, but that’s hard—something won’t snap to grid.

Posted by mgk at September 11, 2003 10:02 AM
Comments

Is this feeling of inverted vertigo similar to that in your blog entry on the episode from West Wing?

http://www.otal.umd.edu/~mgk/blog/archives/000140.html

There seems to be a theme of sensibility to the sublime running through your entries. In the West Wing episode entry it was sound that contributed greatly to the affect. In the WTC towers entry it appears to be a visual effect. Could the surimposition you seek in visual terms be accomplished by a montage of both sound and sight?

Posted by: Francois Lachance at September 11, 2003 03:47 PM | Link to Comment

That's a very sensitive reading, Francois. I don't have an answer for you but I appreciate the suggestion.

Posted by: MGK at September 11, 2003 10:56 PM | Link to Comment

According to what they tell us tourists from Europe, the Empire State Building is built in steps to accommodate zoning rules at the time. In order to keep Manhattan from being to dark, they required a certain footprint to be allowed to build to a certain height.

Posted by: Anders Fagerjord at September 15, 2003 08:51 AM | Link to Comment

Robert Walker photograph "World Trade Center Lobby" page 88 in _New York: Inside Out_ (Skyline Press imprint of OUP, 1984)ISBN 0-19-540603-6

It's the last piece in the book and may be the piece that may help in "snapping to grid".

Posted by: Francois Lachance at September 24, 2003 04:13 PM | Link to Comment
Due to the proliferation of comment spam, I've had to close comments on this entry. If you would like to leave comment, please send email to me at mgk =at= umd =dot= edu. Thank you.