| ||||
Abstract Introduction Experiment Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements References Appendices Credits Back To Main |
Website Structural Navigation
ConclusionsImpact for practitioners
The impact is clearnavigation bars are good, but more so for
advanced users than novice ones. For large websites, they are
invaluable. The amount of screen space lost is minimal and they show users
where they are in the architecture. Web directories can help save people
valuable minutes and hundreds of mouse clicks by implementing them
properly. Since people are occasionally lost and confused without them,
companies can relieve disorder and keep people on their websites for
longer. In the world of e-commerce, that could mean millions of dollars
lost or saved based on a simple navigation aid. Suggestions For Future ResearchersThere are many facets to this experiment that could be improved upon by future researchers.
Refine the theory or develop a new one
Our previous hypothesis that there would be very little time difference
between the nav bar users and non-nav bar users was incorrect. The results
show an obvious difference between those two types of tests. And although
many people do prefer to go straight to a site's homepage, most use the
navigation bars when available. Other Suggestions
Websites that use nav bars may not be using them in the most efficient
way. As the results show, people gave up even when the navbar was present,
so perhaps they need to be made more prominent (especially in the C|Net
example). But the nav bars are of no use if the site's overall
architecture is flawed and not created properly. Things such as too many
levels or too many items per level could create more confusion than
necessary that even a complex navigation aid could not help with. Webpage
design is a field that requires much work and testing to make as many
people as possible comfortable with the site. | |||
|
||||