Shore '00: Student HCI Online Research Experiments

University of Maryland

Abstract
Introduction
Experiment
Results
Discussion of Results
Conclusions

Acknowledgements
References
Appendices
Credits
Feedback

Back To Main

The Effect of Screen Size on Readability Using Three Different Portable Devices

References

  1. Bednall, Elizabeth S. (1992). “The effect of screen format on visual list search.” Ergonomics. 35, no. 4 : 369-383.
  2. Dyson, Mary C., and Gary J, Kipping. (1998). “the effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen.” Visible language. 32, no. 2 : 150-181.
  3. Juola, J. F., Alp Tiritoglu, and J. Pleunis. (1995). “Reading text presented on a small display.” Applied Ergonomics. 26 : 227-229.
  4. Kruk, Richard S, and Paul Muter. (1984). “Reading of continuous text on video screens.” Human Factors. 26, no. 3 : 339-345.
  5. McKenna, B. (1998). "The coming of the electronic book. " Online and CD-ROM Review. 22, no. 5:346-348
  6. Miller, Bob, et al. (1997). “Comparison of readability in AMLCD and CRT displays.” SHORE http://www.otal.umd.edu/SHORE/bs33/.
  7. Mills, Carol Bergfeld, and Linda J. Weldon. (1987). “Reading text from computer screens.” ACM Computing Surveys. 19, no. 4 : 329-358.
  8. Piolat, A., Roussey, J., and O. Thunin. (1997). “Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 47, no. 4 : 513-607.
  9. Rahman, Rarjin, and Paul Muter. (1999). “Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows.” Human Factors. 41, no. 1 : 106-117.
  10. Schilit, Bill N., et al. (1999). “The reading appliance revolution.” Computer. 32, no.1 : 65 +.
  11. Ziefle, Martina. (1998). “Effects of display resolution on visual performance.” Human Factors. 40, no. 4: 554-568.



Department of Computer Sciences: Direct questions and comments to the student editorial team

University of Maryland