| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract Introduction Experiment Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements References Appendices Credits Feedback Back To Main |
Comparison of Photo Library ProgramsResultsWe used Microsoft Excel to do the statistical analysis of our data. Our experiment yielded sets of task times and subjective satisfaction scores for each of the photo library programs. Using this data we calculated means, standard deviations, and variances for each data set. We also used single factor ANOVA to test our data for statistical significance. The statistical information is presented both in charts and graphically below. Task TimesThe ANOVA test on the task times yielded a P-Value = .03 which was significant at alpha = .05. From this we can conclude that the differences in task times are statistically significant. See data appendices.
Subjective SatisfactionThe ANOVA tests on the subjective satisfaction questions one through five yielded P-Values of 0.009, 0.282, 0.154, 0.061, 0.285 respectively. Using alpha = .05 we can conclude that only question one had statistically significant differences. See data appendices.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Computer Science: Direct questions and comments to the student editorial team |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||